Henry Cort
Inventor - Creator of puddled iron - Father of iron trade
This page is part of a website based on the life and achievements of eighteenth-century inventor Henry Cort.
The creator and owner of the site was Eric Alexander who passed away. The site is now hosted by Geneagraphie.com
Please contact us with any comments or queries.
Pages
  1. Homepage
  2. Life of Henry Cort
  3. Cort's processes in iron manufacture
  4. Cort's patents
  5. Refutation of allegations of conspiracies against Cort
  6. Adam Jellicoe's death
  7. Henry Cort's birth
  8. A navy agent's business
  9. Early life of John Becher
  10. Attwick & Burges families
  11. "Cortship" of second wife
  12. Thomas Morgan
  13. Henry Cort's hoops contract
  14. 1856 Accolade
  15. Generosity of friends 1789-94
  16. James Watson
  17. Illness of Cort's son
  18. Main sources of information
  19. Contemporary sources
  20. Navy sources
  21. Chancery files
  22. Publications about Cort
  23. Assessment of Cort's character
  24. Images of Henry Cort
  25. Impeach-tranferred to 05

  26. Parliamentary inquiry 1811-2
  27. The furore of the 1850s
  28. Society of Arts
  29. Cort's first marriage
  30. Henry Cort's children
  31. Cort family pensions
  32. Henry Cort's Hertfordshire property
  33. 1791 signatories
  34. Guiana and the Cort-Gladstone connection
  35. Cort's twilight years
  36. Memorials to Henry Cort

  37. Smelting of iron
  38. Fining before Cort
  39. Shropshire & Staffordshire ironmasters
  40. Cumbrians: Wilkinson etc
  41. Early works at Merthyr Tydfil
  42. The Crowley business
  43. London ironmongers
  44. Scottish iron
  45. Cort's promotion efforts 1783-6
  46. Later Merthyr connections
  47. Puddling after Henry Cort

  48. Gosport in Cort's day
  49. Gosport administration
  50. Gosport worthies
  51. The Amherst-Porter network
  52. James Hackman, murderer
  53. Samuel Marshall
  54. Samuel Jellicoe's legacy
  55. Links with Titchfield
  56. Links with Fareham

  57. Fact, error and conjecture
  58. 18th century politics
  59. Law in the 18th century
  60. 18th century finance
  61. Religion and sexual mores
  62. Calendar change of 1752
  63. Shelburne, Parry and associates
  64. John Becher's family
  65. The Becher-Thackeray lineage
  66. Thomas Lyttelton: a fantastic narrative
  67. Eighteenth-century London
  68. Abolition and the Corts
  69. The Burges will tangle

  70. Navy connections
  71. Navy agent's business
  72. Cort's clients
  73. Ships' pursers
  74. History of Adam Jellicoe
  75. Dundas & Trotter
  76. Cort's navy office associates
  77. Toulmin & other agents
  78. Sandwich & Middleton
  79. The Arethusa
  80. John Becher's war
  81. Thomas Morgan's war
  82. The 1782 Jamaica convoy
  83. Sinking of the Royal George
  84. Rickman & Scott: two contrasting naval careers-Missing


  85. Visitors 2006-2009
  86. Developement of the site 2006-2009

  87. ****************
  88. Daniel Guion and family
  89. Extremely bad academic work and extremely bad journalism

 

image002


The navy agent's finances


It is clear that Cort receives a respectable income as a navy agent, although there are few clues about its sources. For one thing, he employs at least one clerk.

The most notable one is John Kendrick. As early as 1762, pension records show him receiving widows' remittances on behalf of Batty & Cort. He witnesses Dandy Kidd's will in 1772. Later he will set up his own agency in Crutched Friars.

In 1770 the job of collecting widow's pensions passes from Kendrick to a new clerk, Richard Ashton. Cort is not always happy with Ashton's work, blaming him for difficulties that lead to Parry's lawsuit.

A third clerk named by Cort is James Charronneau, who with Kendrick draws up an account for Coningsby Norbury that Cort will have to explain away many years later. Probably the same clerk who witnesses Cort's first marriage.

So how is this income obtained?

Some accounts say Cort charges a commission: this is not apparent from the accounts submitted for the Clarke or Parry lawsuits.

On the other hand, the account submitted for Coningsby Norbury by Oliver Toulmin, who takes over Cort's clients after 1773, shows Toulmin deducting a 2.5% commission (six pence per pound, in days when the pound contains 240 pence) from each remittance of Norbury's half-pay.

Cort's accounts do, however, cite interest on accounts in the red. This occurs quite frequently: officers making purchases abroad debit their accounts, which will not be squared until they return and receive their pay. They are effectively running an overdraft, and Cort charges interest as any banker would.

Doubtless he acts like a banker, too, for accounts in the black, using the surplus to invest on his own behalf. There are certainly instances of Cort lending out or investing money. In 1782, long after the end of his period as navy agent, he is reckoned to be owed some £6,500.

Some naval documents at the National Archives bear the names of agents on their first or last pages. Notable here are reports drawn up by Cort's client Edward Pulliblank, master of the Grafton and Favourite during the 1760s, describing installations in foreign ports such as Manila and Trincomalee. Since such reports must have value to the Navy, it's likely that the writer ensures receipt of a financial reward by depositing them with his agent, who doubtless takes a cut.

Although some navy agents are involved in salvage contracts, PRO records show no evidence for this in Cort's business.


It remained generally true that no rating, and officers only to a very limited extent, could draw their pay in cash before the ship paid off. All those discharged from the ship before then (and ships discharged 50 per cent of their companies a year on average) received only a ticket for their wages, encashable on board on the day of paying off, and thereafter at periodic 'recalls'. These tickets could be assigned, and there was a flourishing trade in buying tickets at a discount.

From N.A.M. Rodger, The Wooden World (London, 1986)

The market must have been flooded with foreign coins after 1742 and 1762, when British ships captured the Spanish galleons bringing to Spain the year's accumulated treasure from its American possessions. Their value was distributed in specie among the crews. The Navy pay office made this as difficult as possible. Litigation dragged on for years.

From Liza Picard, Dr Johnson's London (Weiden-feld & Nicholson 2000)

Prize money was not divided throughout the fleet, but only to those crews who were actually present at the capture of the prize. There could therefore accrue to individual Officers and men a number of prizes in which they were interested, but it would take years before the actual prize money was received. When the Officers and often illiterate seamen were at sea, they could not possibly deal with the legal and financial formalities in obtaining the prize money due to them. So grew up the practice of Prize Agency.

From Geoffrey Green, The Royal Navy and Anglo Jewry 1740-1820 (1989)


It is evident from these quotations that there is potentially a fortune to be made from buying up entitlements to pay and prize money. Although there is no record of Cort ever acting as official Prize Agent, he may still have benefited from the entitlements of his clients up to the end of the Severn Years War in 1763. He can go to the Prize Agent and collect the award on the client's behalf, possibly deriving some income for himself in the process. Such transactions will not appear in the National Archives.

Better still if he acts for any of the crew of His Majesty's ships Active and Favourite, who capture the Spanish treasure ship Ermiona in 1762. Her haul is reckoned to be worth some £1.6 million (nearly £100 million at today's prices), with total prize money assessed as £519,705.

The ships' captains and their admiral get the lion's share: £65,000 apiece.

The humble seaman (normally on nineteen shillings a month) is eventually awarded an entitlement of £485. Long enough to wait before the sum is decided: how much longer before he actually receives it?

Put yourself in his position. You have a ticket which entitles you to claim your bounty money. You are supposed to hold on to it while the powers-that-be work out your share. Then you have to go to the right place, where the Prize Agent will present you with your award.

Or you can sell your ticket to someone with money up-front. What he pays may turn out to be less than your entitlement. But could you resist an offer of, say, £200?

Very profitable for a middleman who can buy up a few dozen tickets, notching up an eventual profit of some £300 per ticket. Do Batty, Cort or any of their employees ever act as such middlemen? Once again National Archives don't provide the answer.


Related pages

Navy agent's business

Toulmin and other agents

Cort's clients

Navy office associates

Life of Henry Cort


The pages on this site are copied from the original site of Eric Alexander (henrycort.net) with his allowance.
Eric passed away abt 2012
If you use/copy information from this site, please include a link to the page where you found the information.

6