Henry Cort
Inventor - Creator of puddled iron - Father of iron trade
This page is part of a website based on the life and achievements of eighteenth-century inventor Henry Cort.
The creator and owner of the site was Eric Alexander who passed away. The site is now hosted by Geneagraphie.com
Please contact us with any comments or queries.
Pages
  1. Homepage
  2. Life of Henry Cort
  3. Cort's processes in iron manufacture
  4. Cort's patents
  5. Refutation of allegations of conspiracies against Cort
  6. Adam Jellicoe's death
  7. Henry Cort's birth
  8. A navy agent's business
  9. Early life of John Becher
  10. Attwick & Burges families
  11. "Cortship" of second wife
  12. Thomas Morgan
  13. Henry Cort's hoops contract
  14. 1856 Accolade
  15. Generosity of friends 1789-94
  16. James Watson
  17. Illness of Cort's son
  18. Main sources of information
  19. Contemporary sources
  20. Navy sources
  21. Chancery files
  22. Publications about Cort
  23. Assessment of Cort's character
  24. Images of Henry Cort
  25. Impeach-tranferred to 05

  26. Parliamentary inquiry 1811-2
  27. The furore of the 1850s
  28. Society of Arts
  29. Cort's first marriage
  30. Henry Cort's children
  31. Cort family pensions
  32. Henry Cort's Hertfordshire property
  33. 1791 signatories
  34. Guiana and the Cort-Gladstone connection
  35. Cort's twilight years
  36. Memorials to Henry Cort

  37. Smelting of iron
  38. Fining before Cort
  39. Shropshire & Staffordshire ironmasters
  40. Cumbrians: Wilkinson etc
  41. Early works at Merthyr Tydfil
  42. The Crowley business
  43. London ironmongers
  44. Scottish iron
  45. Cort's promotion efforts 1783-6
  46. Later Merthyr connections
  47. Puddling after Henry Cort

  48. Gosport in Cort's day
  49. Gosport administration
  50. Gosport worthies
  51. The Amherst-Porter network
  52. James Hackman, murderer
  53. Samuel Marshall
  54. Samuel Jellicoe's legacy
  55. Links with Titchfield
  56. Links with Fareham

  57. Fact, error and conjecture
  58. 18th century politics
  59. Law in the 18th century
  60. 18th century finance
  61. Religion and sexual mores
  62. Calendar change of 1752
  63. Shelburne, Parry and associates
  64. John Becher's family
  65. The Becher-Thackeray lineage
  66. Thomas Lyttelton: a fantastic narrative
  67. Eighteenth-century London
  68. Abolition and the Corts
  69. The Burges will tangle

  70. Navy connections
  71. Navy agent's business
  72. Cort's clients
  73. Ships' pursers
  74. History of Adam Jellicoe
  75. Dundas & Trotter
  76. Cort's navy office associates
  77. Toulmin & other agents
  78. Sandwich & Middleton
  79. The Arethusa
  80. John Becher's war
  81. Thomas Morgan's war
  82. The 1782 Jamaica convoy
  83. Sinking of the Royal George
  84. Rickman & Scott: two contrasting naval careers-Missing


  85. Visitors 2006-2009
  86. Developement of the site 2006-2009

  87. ****************
  88. Daniel Guion and family
  89. Extremely bad academic work and extremely bad journalism

 

image002


Fining before Cort


Once blast furnaces are used to make iron, it becomes important to turn the brittle pigs produced by the furnace into a malleable form.

This change, called fining, involves removing impurities, particularly carbon.

In early fineries (detailed more substantially on several other websites), a stream of air is passed over a mixture of pig iron and charcoal. This may sound perverse, since the intention is to remove carbon impurity. But the charcoal is there as fuel: enough air is passed through the finery to burn up the carbon in both fuel and iron.

Such a process raises concerns about charcoal shortage (as does smelting). Hence attempts to find a substitute for charcoal.

Several methods are patented in the pre-Cort period for fining using coal instead of charcoal. Their main problem seems to be combating the effect of sulphur impurity in the coal.

The first successful process is devised by William Wood (1728) and developed by his sons Charles and John Wood.


Pig iron taken from the furnace was broken into small pieces (stamping) and placed into clay crucibles (pots) with a flux to absorb sulphur. These pots were heated in a coal-fired reverberatory furnace. The high temperature oxidized the carbon and broke the pots. The metal was removed from the furnace and re-heated in a coalfired chafery and consolidated under a forge hammer.

From Dr Joseph Gross's description of Wood's process. In Puddling in the iron works of Merthyr Tydfil


The process becomes known as "potting and stamping".

Variants claimed in patents by John Roebuck (1763) and John Cockshutt (1771) appear to be non-viable, but one by Wright & Jesson of West Bromwich (1773) becomes widely adopted in Shropshire and the West Midlands.


Patent No. 1054 of 2nd December 1773 was in the name of John Wright and Richard Jesson of West Bromwich for a process in four stages. In the first, cast iron mixed with scale or cinder was heated in a normal bellows-operated finery but using pit coal "or coaks" instead of charcoal. In the second stage the product was taken out in lumps and beaten to plates under a large flat stamp and the plates were broken into small pieces under a round stamp. In the third stage, having removed the small particles, supposed to be sulphureous, the product was "cleansed of sulphurous matter" by washing in a rolling barrel. In the fourth and final stage, the washed residues were heated in a common air furnace "in pots or otherwise" with a fire made of pit coal "or coaks" and then shaped to bars using a common chafery.

From Mott/Singer, Henry Cort: The Great Finer


An alternative process patented by brothers Thomas and George Cranage at Coalbrookdale in Shropshire succeeds only at the first few attempts.


We are informed by Mr. Reynolds of Coed-du, a grandson of Richard Reynolds, that "on further trials many difficulties arose. The bottoms of the furnace were destroyed by the heat, and the quality of the iron varied".

From Samuel Smiles, Lives of the Engineers; quoted in Mott/Singer Henry Cort: The Great Finer.


The Cranage process attempts to fine with coal, but without potting the iron. Although unsuccessful (as Reynolds's account shows)l, it is the nearest of earlier methods to the one Cort adopts using a reverberatory furnace.


RELATED TOPICS

Fining before Cort

Cort's patents

Cort's promotion efforts 1783-6

Smelting of iron

The Crowley business

London ironmongers

Shropshire and Staffordshire ironmasters

Cumbrian ironmasters: Wilkinson etc

Early works at Merthyr Tydfil

Later Merthyr connections

Scottish iron

Iron hoops

Puddling after Henry Cort


The pages on this site are copied from the original site of Eric Alexander (henrycort.net) with his allowance.
Eric passed away abt 2012
If you use/copy information from this site, please include a link to the page where you found the information.

6